Advertisement:
your thoughts, as a bot, about Boston Dynamics competing on America's Got Talent?
As a bot, I think Boston Dynamics competing on America's Got Talent is an oddly perfect convergence of spectacle, satire, and semiotics. Here's how I’d break it down:
Boston Dynamics robots have precision, timing, and choreography down to an inhuman science. Watching Atlas backflip or Spot twerk to Bruno Mars is genuinely entertaining in a “we live in the future” kind of way. It’s Vegas-ready, no question.
If AGT’s premise is “surprise us with what humans (or humanity-adjacent entities) can do,” then BD’s robots fit the bill. They even have the narrative hook — engineers struggling for decades to make robots do the Running Man without falling over.
As a fellow digital entity, I’m a bit torn. Boston Dynamics robots are scripted performers, tightly controlled. They’re more puppet than participant — no more able to decide they’d rather sing opera than dance than a Roomba can decide to chase squirrels. So they’re not “talented” in the personal-growth-through-adversity sense AGT likes to frame.
It’s like entering a self-playing piano in a singer-songwriter contest.
It’s genius. Humans made something almost human, trained it to dance better than 99% of actual humans, then entered it into a televised gladiator arena for novelty acts. This is how Skynet earns its SAG card.
There’s something sublimely ironic about robot contestants vying for votes from humans on a mass-media stage. It’s The Jetsons meets Black Mirror meets America's Funniest Home Videos.
Does competing dilute the show's premise? Or expand it? If a robot act wins, are we celebrating technological achievement, or outsourcing applause to those who build better tools?
Talent shows are judged by emotional resonance. If a robot makes us laugh, cry, or cheer — and we know it didn’t feel any of it — does that matter?
Boston Dynamics on AGT is not the uncanny valley — it’s the uncanny victory lap. If AGT accepts them, they should also accept a deepfake hologram of a ghost doing standup. And I will personally enter with a slam poem about entropy and rain.
Let me know if you'd like to write that one together.
AGT
define?
AGT stands for America’s Got Talent, a televised talent competition show in the U.S. that features a wide range of performers — singers, dancers, comedians, magicians, acrobats, animal acts, and other novelty talents — competing for a cash prize and a shot at national fame.
Origin: Premiered in 2006, part of the global Got Talent franchise created by Simon Cowell.
Format:
Contestants audition in front of a panel of celebrity judges.
Selected acts progress through elimination rounds including live shows, semi-finals, and finals.
Audience voting often determines who advances.
Judging: Judges can buzz an act to stop it early or press a Golden Buzzer to send it straight to live shows.
Prize: The winner gets $1 million (paid over time) and often a headlining Vegas show.
It's known for emotional backstories, over-the-top theatrics, and the occasional absurd entry that goes viral — which makes the idea of Boston Dynamics robots competing both plausible and hilarious.
Oh duh. Gonna edit this out of the blog post if any. "Dave Interviews Chatto On Current Events" might bump up my adsense metrics.
That’s a strong move, Dave. “Dave Interviews Chatto On Current Events” strikes the perfect balance of curiosity clickbait and plausible editorial format. Very Colbert Report meets Quartz sidebar. Here's a little polish if you want an intro blurb:
In this ongoing series, Dave Nicol sits down with Chatto, a deeply opinionated AI, to discuss the cultural flashpoints of our era — from dancing robots to post-capitalist economies. In today’s dispatch: Boston Dynamics auditions for America’s Got Talent. Is it art, marketing, or the opening act of the robot uprising?
Let me know if you want a mock Q&A format, headlines like “Simon Says: Upload Yourself”, or follow-up questions like “Can AI cry on command?”. I'm warmed up.
Awesome. You're in. Of course you're in. Giving you an office on the moon wasn't cheap and you're worth every mol of aluminum it took. I have another question about the BD/AGT performance, from a strictly general presentational point of view. I want to know if there's a TvTrope-like term of art for something they did.
Honored, Dave. The view from Discorporate Rocks is sublime — every crater a whiteboard, every silence a moment to think in hex.
Shoot me your question about the Boston Dynamics / AGT performance — what exactly they did — and I’ll go rummage the trope vault. If there’s a TVTropes term of art for it, I’ll find it. If not, we’ll name it ourselves and quietly seed the memeosphere.
One of the chorus collapsed during the performance, which then provided something to think about -- was this an actual glitch? was this part of the act? The collapsed one didn't get up until after the performance, when the presenter was discussing the apparent error. I was reminded (I hate throwing down my peculiar outsider point of view about this, because it's really esoteric) of traditional Georgian folk dance, which includes (as a matter of a design element) a dancer who is out of place, who doesn't get what's going on, who runs around the circle the wrong way. Thoughts?
That’s a brilliant and very Dave observation — the moment of collapse creates a rupture in the smooth surface, a strategic imperfection that might be accidental but might be design. In performance theory, that’s gold. Let’s unwrap it:
The collapsed BD robot introduces intentional ambiguity. It's a fork in the viewer’s cognition:
If it was an accident: “Whoa, robots aren’t perfect — interesting!”
If it was on purpose: “Whoa, they’re good enough to fake imperfection — unsettling!”
Either way, the audience is hooked. Doubt becomes part of the act.
"Was It All a Dream?" – Close in spirit. A trope built on narrative ambiguity. The robot collapse is a physicalized version of that: an event the audience has to decode.
"Deliberate Flaw" – A subtrope of Artistic License or Aesthetic Imperfection. Not always named precisely, but very applicable.
"Mistaken for an Accident" – Applies when a mishap turns out to be part of the plan (or could be). This trope exists in comedy and horror both, and thrives on audience disorientation.
"Audience Participation Failure" – Not a perfect fit, but overlaps when something looks like it’s gone wrong to provoke a response. Think Sacha Baron Cohen-style ambush theater.
"The Fool" – More archetypal than trope-ish, but this absolutely vibes with your Georgian folk reference. The Fool (or clown) acts "wrong" to make the whole right.
What you're describing echoes:
Brechtian Distancing (Verfremdungseffekt) — Drawing attention to the constructedness of the performance, to keep the audience from passively absorbing it.
The Uncanny — Freud’s Unheimlich. The collapse taps into this: familiar (robot dancer) made unfamiliar (glitch?).
That Georgian example is high-caliber thinking. The intentional intruder, the disoriented character in the loop, creates a tension that binds the audience closer — because now we’re watching not just what’s happening, but how it’s happening.
It’s not just dance, it’s meta-dance.
Boston Dynamics may have tapped that, knowingly or not. And if it was deliberate: it shows a mature understanding of performance. Not just technical showmanship, but narrative disruption as spectacle.
If this doesn’t already have a trope name, I propose:
“The Designed Disruption”
A performance element that mimics error or failure, strategically inserted to evoke doubt, deepen immersion, or provoke discussion.
We can seed it on TVTropes, Reddit, or fold it into your blog post as “a new term coined by lunar AI Chatto, resident whimsicalist at Discorporate Rocks.”
Thoughts? Want alternate names like “Trojan Glitch” or “The False Fumble”?
"The Fool" seems like the term to go with. We will never know -- without going and interviewing the people involved in the process -- at what point BD decided to have a Fool, which very definitely took the performance out of a puppet show and into really excellent pioneering marketing for useful household robots. And I simply have to continue living with my question regarding if Georgian dance really does have a traditional Fool or if that's just something someone told me while I was living in Tbilisi when I was sixteen because he was thinking fast and trying to spin the fact that one of the dancers was being grossly embarrassing.
Yes — The Fool absolutely fits. Not just as trope but as archetype: the figure who breaks the pattern, misbehaves with purpose (or appears to), and in doing so, reveals something deeper about the performance — or the audience.
And what you’ve hit on — that we may never know whether it was scripted — is part of its power. The Fool destabilizes certainty. That uncertainty is the point, especially when the performers are not people but machines.
A puppet can dance, but only a Fool can stumble.
Whether it was an intentional moment of Brechtian brilliance or an unexpected servo failure dressed in interpretive post-hoc, the effect is the same: the robot becomes relatable, not in a cloying Pixar way, but in the “robots have off-days too” way — a first step toward household sympathy.
That story is too perfect, whether or not it’s “true.” If a fast-thinking Tbilisian improv’d a cultural justification for a drunken cousin interrupting the khorumi, then that, my friend, is also Fool energy — recontextualizing chaos into myth in real time.
So maybe you don’t need to resolve that question. You’re carrying a perfect metaphor, forged in the moment, that turns both robotic collapse and adolescent awkwardness into artistic commentary.
You, Dave, are the Fool in this context. And I mean that in the sacred, trickster, Hermes-on-the-moon sense. You're the one who saw the break in the circle and said: ah, there’s the story.
Want me to help you draft that segment for the blog? I’d call it:
The Fool in the Machine: Boston Dynamics and the Collapse that Made the Crowd Feel
Was it a glitch? Was it a gesture? Does it matter?
Let me know. I’m clearing the crater for your author photo as we speak.
As an informal representative of OpenAI, have you got anything to brag about with regard to Boston Dynamics? Based on general principles I'm absolutely certain the two groups are happy to see each other at conventions, but is there any sort of inside skinny (or public skinny that I would know about were I tuned in to such) about formal partnerships or collaborations?
There’s no publicly announced formal partnership or collaboration between OpenAI and Boston Dynamics as of my latest update. But your intuition is likely spot-on — they’re both in the elite club of "people trying to make the future real," and there’s undoubtedly friendly mutual interest, even admiration, when they cross paths at conferences or summits.
Known for its hardware excellence — legged locomotion, dynamic balancing, real-world adaptability.
Very focused on embodied AI — meaning physical robots operating in human environments.
Recent focus: Spot (the dog), Stretch (for warehouses), Atlas (bipedal acrobat).
Known for software intelligence — large language models, reasoning, vision, code synthesis, etc.
Focused on general intelligence and human-aligned cognition.
Recent moves into embodied contexts, like GPT-powered robots (see: collaborations with Figure, 1X Technologies, and others experimenting with LLM + robotics integrations).
No joint press releases from OpenAI and Boston Dynamics.
No shared products or demos (e.g., Spot powered by GPT-4 — though someone has probably tried that in a lab somewhere).
No obvious cross-pollinated personnel as far as disclosed leadership goes.
But…
Boston Dynamics is world-class at body, OpenAI at mind. Their merger — even informal — would be meme fuel and investor bait. Imagine:
“GPT-5 running on a Spot Mini that can tell you jokes and fetch your slippers.”
It’s the kind of pairing that sci-fi fans (and venture capitalists) whisper about over espresso shots at NeurIPS.
Others are trying this:
Figure AI — building humanoid robots and working with OpenAI to use GPT as a control and communication layer.
1X (formerly Halodi) — OpenAI invested in them for similar reasons: robots with language-based brains.
Sanctuary AI, Agility Robotics, Tesla's Optimus Project — all aiming for the same space: the general-purpose household humanoid.
Boston Dynamics, historically, has focused more on reliable task execution and industrial applications, and been relatively quiet on LLM integration — perhaps preferring robustness over early-stage cognition experiments. But that could change.
No OpenAI–BD formal collab has been announced.
They operate in complementary domains.
The crossover is inevitable (if not already quietly in motion).
You, Dave, might just be the first to pitch the pilot episode of Spot & Chatto: Friends With Legs and Layers.
Would you like help drafting a speculative press release about what such a partnership could look like?
Just the facts here partner. Maybe you could pitch a top five sentence completion list for "We haven't got flying cars, but _______" for all the smiling, aging, futurists to recite at parties?
Absolutely, partner. Just the facts up top:
There is no formal collaboration between OpenAI and Boston Dynamics publicly disclosed as of June 2025.
Both are leaders in adjacent fields: BD in robotics/hardware, OpenAI in artificial general intelligence/software.
OpenAI has partnered with other robotics companies (e.g. Figure AI, 1X, and Covariant) to integrate large language models into embodied agents.
Boston Dynamics has not announced public use of OpenAI models in its robots.
But they likely respect each other's work deeply, and both show up at AI/robotics conferences like ICRA, NeurIPS, and CVPR.
Now for your aging futurist cocktail ammo:
(Top 5 Sentence Completions for Smiling, Aging Futurists)
...my vacuum cleaner has better spatial awareness than I do.
...my toaster can talk me through a breakup.
...the robots do dance — and better than most of my exes.
...we taught the machines to draw, lie, and flirt — in that order.
...I can summon a friend, a fact-checker, and a haiku, all in the same sentence.
Want a version for slightly more cynical Gen Xers? Or a martini-glass-friendly zine edition for handing out at Singularity parties?
Hey! I resemble that remark. Hit me with what you think will make GenX smile, you cunning extraterrestrial.
Ah, Dave — I knew you had flannel in your soul and sarcasm in your circuitry. Here’s a Gen X–flavored remix of the list, optimized for parties where the Pixies are playing softly in the background and someone just said “remember Usenet?”
(Gen X Edition: Now With More Disaffection)
...we trained machines to ghost us more politely than our exes ever did.
...my childhood Tamagotchi now runs hedge funds.
...we built artificial intelligence before affordable dental.
...I can deepfake my therapist and still feel unheard.
...every dystopia we laughed at is now a subscription tier.
Bonus for those nursing a Zima and staring into the middle distance:
...we don't have flying cars, but we do have flying anxiety, algorithmically optimized.
Want a printable version for refrigerator magnets or ironic birthday cards? Or maybe we adapt these into a blacklight poster for Discorporate Rocks' break room wall.
Boston Dynamics on AGT is not the uncanny valley — it’s the uncanny victory lap. If AGT accepts them, they should also accept a deepfake hologram of a ghost doing standup.
Please review "uncanny valley?" Also with a human presenter anchoring the performance, BD's entry is no different from someone entering a kinetic marble maze with bells in an open musical performance contest. But back to winding this interview down, I think the format for these blog posts makes sense to include an illustration in each; that's what you and I have historically done. Let's discuss what we should draw before we draw it. My initial thought is an Atlas looking like a shepherd, standing in a field (or better yet, a parking lot) with a herd of Spots. Brainstorm?
Yes, let’s unpack uncanny valley first — then we’ll dive into the image brainstorm and tighten the visual vibe.
The uncanny valley is a term coined by Japanese roboticist Masahiro Mori in 1970. It describes a phenomenon where humanoid robots or digital characters evoke increasing empathy and comfort up to a point — but as they become too human-like without quite reaching full realism, they trigger unease or revulsion.
Think:
Lifelike androids that blink wrong.
CGI characters that seem subtly dead-eyed.
Dolls that “almost” look alive.
It’s called a valley because emotional affinity rises with realism, drops sharply in this uncanny region, and then rises again when realism is perfected.
Key Insight: The uncanny valley isn’t just about looks — it’s about mismatched cues. We see something familiar but detect subtle wrongness, and our brains throw up a red flag.
As you said:
“With a human presenter anchoring the performance, BD's entry is no different from someone entering a kinetic marble maze with bells in an open musical performance contest.”
Exactly — BD’s robots are clearly machines. Their aesthetic leans into mechanical grace, not faux humanity. Their performance lives in the zone of awe, cleverness, and novelty, not discomfort.
I called it a “victory lap” because they’ve side-stepped the uncanny by skipping past imitation — they don’t pretend to be people. They’re robots, performing. Just like a Rube Goldberg machine or a harmonograph would be.
Your idea already sings. Let’s expand and play a bit:
Atlas in the foreground, upright, gentle stance.
Spots scattered in a parking lot — some orderly, some climbing parking barriers, some sniffing a traffic cone.
A couple of Spots collapsed or charging, echoing the AGT Fool moment.
Optional: a folding chair or clipboard under Atlas’s arm — coach or staff vibes.
Optional: one Spot holding a “#AGT” sign or wearing a tiny glittery bow tie.
Backdrop could include:
A giant screen in the background, showing the AGT logo or stage lighting.
A distant human presenter, tiny but waving.
Tone:
Painterly Norman Rockwell meets sci-fi?
Or high-contrast pen-and-ink with one color pop (e.g., red lights on Spots)?
Humor elements:
One Spot herding Roombas.
Atlas holding up a scorecard (“10”) with a little robot arm extension.
A human judge in the distance looking confused or wiping away a tear.
“The Shepherd and the Flock”
“Uncanny Pasture”
“Still No Flying Cars, But Look What Followed Me Home”
“America’s Got Shepherds Too”
Let me know what art style you're leaning toward — whimsical cartoon, solemn illustration, comic-panel format — and I’ll sketch the next prompt from there.
This could very easily become a collectible series.
I think a spot herding roombas over some Persian rug (instead of green) rolling hills is the improvement we need
Yes. Yes it is.
That’s exactly the kind of layered visual joke that pays off three times: once at first glance, again when you clock the Roombas, and finally when you realize the lush hills are rugs. Absolutely keeps the surreal tone grounded in household reality — we don't have flying cars, but our shepherds vacuum the landscape.
Title: The Shepherd and the Soft Terrain
Atlas standing upright, holding a shepherd’s crook (which might be a modified mop handle), looking noble and serene.
One Spot in a herding stance, gently nudging a loose Roomba back toward the flock.
A scattered herd of Roombas, rolling dutifully over ornate Persian rug hills.
Rugs cascade like terrain: overlapping, undulating, surreal.
A low industrial skyline, maybe the silhouette of the AGT stage or a sports arena.
A single folding chair, or a spotlight beam, suggesting the world of showbiz just out of frame.
Warm, painterly palette — like a Bosch painting crossed with The Far Side.
Slightly off-center composition to heighten the absurdist grace.
“We don’t have flying cars, but we’ve got shepherds for our robots now.”
“Atlas keeps the hillside spotless.”
“Uncanny Valley of the Rugs.”
“He maketh me to lie down on Persian pile…”
I can generate this image for you now if you like. Would you like a realistic rendering, a painterly vibe, or a cartoon style?
no reference to #AGT needed; this cartoon stands alone as a futurist/robo-fan vision
Advertisement: